Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kalamazoo, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
Kalamazoo County, Michigan and Kalamazoo, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00438
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC,, Purdue Pharma L.P., McKESSON CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN and Calhoun, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Muskegon, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Muskegon, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Branch, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Branch County, Michigan and Branch, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Eaton, County of v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00823
Defendant:
SpecGx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eaton, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lighthall et al v. Kroger Co., The
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Randy Lighthall and Christine Lighthall
Defendant:
Kroger Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheaton v. Kroger Co., The
as 1:2010cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Wheaton
Defendant:
Kroger Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michigan, State of v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lansing, City of et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00778
Plaintiff:
Lansing, City of, Dickinson Press Inc and Scott Murphy
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
