Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barron v. Deboo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00639
Petitioner: James Roy Barron, Jr
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Denny v. Deboo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02070
Petitioner: Eric Denny
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Timmons v. Ives, et al
as 2:2008cv00422
Petitioner: Marcus Christopher Timmons
Respondent: Richard B. Ives, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Butler v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv02598
Petitioner: Joelen Tyrice Butler
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lee v. Deboo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02255
Petitioner: Gregory W. Lee
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cutrer v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv01533
Petitioner: Michael Cutrer
Defendant: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCloud v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv01350
Petitioner: Russell McCloud
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reyes v. Deboo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01269
Plaintiff: Jose Mercado Reyes
Defendant: Kuma J. Deboo, Babel Foods Administrator, Salinas Safty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skurdal v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv01245
Petitioner: Rodney Owen Skurdal
Defendant: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hinshaw v. Hardcastle et al
as 2:2007cv01238
Plaintiff: Charles Hinshaw
Defendant: John B. Hardcastle, David A. Glockner and Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?