Cases filed in Pennsylvania
PETTY v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2014cv04578
Petitioner: RODNEY L. PETTY
Respondent: JOHN C. THOMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETTY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41430
Plaintiff: ERNEST L. PETTY
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PETTY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40479
Plaintiff: WALTER L. PETTY
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PETTY v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33587
Plaintiff: WALTER L. PETTY
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PETTY v. T & N et al
as 2:2009cv74470
Plaintiff: EDDIE L. PETTY
Defendant: T & N, UNIROYAL, INC., UNIROYAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
PETTY v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66124
Plaintiff: CHARLES L. PETTY, JR., CHARLES L. PETTY, JR., CHARLES L. PETTY, JR. and others
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
PETTIS v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73150
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. PETTIS, ROBERT L. PETTIS, ROBERT L. PETTIS and others
Defendant: A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant: ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
PETTY v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72368
Plaintiff: WILLIE L. PETTY
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?