Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tabatha L. Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peters v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2022cv03259
Petitioner:
Troy L Peters
Respondent:
Franklin Co. Sheriff Dallas Baldwin and Mike Turner
Defendant:
Tonja Phillips, Syble Sayon, Nalea Cobb Whiting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00898
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. , Samuel L. Peters, Individually and as Trustee of the Trust of Samuel L. Peters , Miami Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Uforma/Shelby Business Forms Inc , Samuel L Peters , Miami Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02661
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc., Samuel L. Peters, Miami Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Peters et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20728
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Peters and Stephanie L. Peters
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olcese, et al v. Rohal, et al
as 5:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
L. Peter Olcese and Benicia Barria Gonzalez
Defendant:
John D. Rohal, Estate of Patricia D. Rohal, Sergio Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
