Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. Farley et al
as 1:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Dantrell Alan Posey
Defendant:
Mary Farley, James Jim LaFavers and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Posey v. Farley et al
as 1:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Dantrell Alan Posey
Defendant:
Mary Farley, James Jim LaFavers and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, D Wonders, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Lafavers
as 3:2022cv00793
Petitioner:
Michael Henderson
Respondent:
NFN Lafavers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
James Lafavers, James Randall Smith, Jeffery Marton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lafavers et al
as 4:2021cv01311
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
James Lafavers, James Randall Smith, Jeffery Marton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 4:2021cv01641
Respondent:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, Brian Long, LINDA MOLINA and others
Petitioner:
Quintin Phillippe Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
