Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BARTOW HMA, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv02872
Plaintiff:
STATESVILLE HMA, LLC, HMA SANTA ROSA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WINDER HMA LLC et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
WINDER HMA LLC , BARTOW HMA, LLC , BILOXI HMA LLC and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MILLER et. al. vs HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. et. al.
as 1:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. MILLER and MICHAEL J. METTS
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC, ROSE CITY, LLC, ROSE CITY HMA, INC. d/b/a LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
IN RE: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. QUI TAM LITIGATION (NO. II)
as 1:2014mc00339
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S. BRUMMER , THOMAS L. MASON , STEVEN G. FOLSTAD and others
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , MONROE HMA LLC , WINDER HMA LLC and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel MILLER et al vs HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
as PAE/2:10-cv-03007
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. MILLER and MICHAEL J. METTS
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , Rose City, LLC , ROSE CITY HMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GEORGE MILLER, ET AL V. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, ET AL
as 5:2010cv03007
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. MILLER and MICHAEL J. METTS
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., ROSE CITY, LLC, ROSE CITY HMA, INC. d/b/a LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
