Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lance Poulsen v. USA
as 15-3901
Petitioner / Appellant: LANCE K. POULSEN
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lance Poulsen v. USA
as 15-3900
Petitioner / Appellant: LANCE K. POULSEN
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lance Poulsen v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3901
Petitioner - Appellant: LANCE K. POULSEN
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lance Poulsen v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3900
Petitioner - Appellant: LANCE K. POULSEN
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Poulsen v. USA
as 2:2013cv00261
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Lance K Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Poulsen v. USA
as 2:2013cv00259
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Lance K Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v. Bank One, N.A., et al
as 1:2012cv07263
Plaintiff: Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
Defendant: Bank One, N.A., BANC ONE CAPITAL MARKETS, INC., Credit Suisse First Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Metropolitan Life, et al v. Bank One, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv07264
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Insurance and Annuity Company
Defendant: Bank One, N.A., BANC ONE CAPITAL MARKETS, INC., Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lance Poulsen v. Bank One, N.A.
as 12-4021
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANCE K. POULSEN
Defendant - Appellee: BANK ONE, N.A.
Arizona, State of, et al v. Credit Suisse First, et al
as 1:2012cv05804
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of , Pima County Community College District , San Luis, City of and others
Defendant: Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation , Bank One NA , Bank One Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?