Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Sacramento Homeless Union, et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 23-16123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, a local of the California Homeless Union/Statewide Organizing Council, BETTY RIOS, DONTA WILLIAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF PHOENIX, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Coalition on Homelessness, et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-15087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS, TORO CASTANO, SARAH CRONK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-16649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. Cangress, et al
as 21-55408
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor:
CANGRESS, DBA Los Angeles Community Action Network (LA CAN)
Amicus Curiae:
HOPE STREET COALITION, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55404
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES VAN SCOY, KARYN PINSKY, CHARLES MALOW and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LATINO COALITION OF LOS ANGELES and JOSUE TIGUILA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES, WOMEN IN SKID ROW and others
League of California Cities, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-71765
Petitioner:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Joseph Hardesty, et al v. Sacramento County, et al
as 18-15773
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JARED T. SCHNEIDER, JOSEPH HARDESTY, JAY L. SCHNEIDER and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SHERRY, JEFF GAMEL and ROGER DICKINSON
Defendant:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 17-17144
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LORI RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
