Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Copeland v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A. Copeland v. Raymond Lane, et al
as 13-16251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A. J. COPELAND, individually and derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. LANE, GARY REINER, LEO APOTHEKER and others
Neumann v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 5:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Paul Neumann
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company, Margaret C. Whitman, Leo Apotheker and others
Movant:
David Wagner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Morrical v. Whitman et al
as 3:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
Stanley Morrical
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Leo Apotheker, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Pokoik v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 4:2012cv06074
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company , Autonomy Corporation PLC, Deloitte LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nicolow v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 3:2012cv05980
Plaintiff:
Allan J. Nicolow
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company , Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Movant:
Andrea Bascheri and Stanley Morrical
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Richard Gammel v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 8:2011cv01404
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Hewlett-Packard Company and Catherine A Lesjak
Plaintiff:
Richard Gammel
Copeland v. Lane et al
as 5:2011cv01058
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Raymond J. Lane, Gary Reiner, Leo Apotheker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Copeland v. Lane et al
as 3:2011cv01058
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Raymond J. Lane, Gary Reiner, Leo Apotheker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
