Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lester Eugene Jenkins v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
as 23-11538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESTER JENKINS
Interested Party:
DWIGHT SIPLES, JR., KENNETH WAYNE DAVENPORT and MICHAEL EUGENE MOULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Dwight Siples, Jr. v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
as 23-11539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT SIPLES, JR.
Interested Party:
LESTER JENKINS, KENNETH WAYNE DAVENPORT and MICHAEL EUGENE MOULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC. and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
In Re Deepwater Horizon Belo Cases v. Lester Jenkins, et al
as 23-11535
Interested Party:
LESTER JENKINS, DWIGHT SIPLES, JR., KENNETH WAYNE DAVENPORT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC. and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Michael Eugene Moulder v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
as 23-11537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE MOULDER
Interested Party:
LESTER JENKINS, DWIGHT SIPLES, JR. and KENNETH WAYNE DAVENPORT
Defendant / Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC. and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Kenneth Wayne Davenport, et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
as 23-11536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE DAVENPORT
Interested Party:
LESTER JENKINS, DWIGHT SIPLES, JR. and MICHAEL EUGENE MOULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03079
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BESSON, DUSTIN LEDOUX, CHRISTOPHER PROSPERIE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Sanders et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Besson, Dustin Ledoux, Christopher Prosperie and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
