Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PENLAND et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J. PENLAND, CAROLYN B. PENLAND, ERNEST C. CLOER, JR. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Levine v. US
as 21-1499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEDAIAT CHAHARLANGI, ROXANA GOMEZ, SARA MAMMADOV and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In re: Wiley
as 19-1774
Appellant:
In re: PAUL WILEY, MATTHEW LEVINE and AARON LLOYD
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
CUMMINGS V CONVERSE
as 11-1099
Defendant-Appellee:
Converse, Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Jay G. Levine and William G. Cummings
BENGIS V MOSS
as 09-1049
Plaintiff-Appellant:
John Joseph Bengis
Defendant-Appellee:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Richard Moss, Esq.
SYMANTEC V COMPUTER ASSOCIATES INTL
as 07-1201
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant:
Computer Associates International, Inc.
Cross-Appellant:
Richard B. Levin
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
Symantec Corporation
IN RE LEVINE
as 06-1429
Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
Matthew Levine
LEVINE V US
as 06-5026
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MATTHEW E. LEVINE, MATTHEW E. LEVINE and MATTHEW E. LEVINE
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
MATTOX V INFOTOPIA INC
as 05-1017
Defendant-Appellee:
DAVID RICHMOND, INFOTOPIA, INC., MARK LEVINE and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
E. MICHAEL MATTOX
MEEKER V MSPB
as 02-3042
Intervenor:
ANN S. AZDELL, DONALD B. FISHMAN, ANN S. AZDELL and others
Amicus Curiae:
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS, PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA, THE AMERICAN LEGION and others
Petitioner:
F. WILLIAM ROGGEVEEN, JAY E. LEVINE, KAY COLES JAMES, Director, Office of Personnel Management and others
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
