Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Levin v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 1:2021cv02641
Plaintiff:
Woodrow H. Levin
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Scott Wallis v. Alan Levine, et al
as 13-1594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT WALLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN LEVINE, BARRY COHODES, PETTI MURPHY & ASSOCIATES and others
Wallis v. Levine et al
as 1:2012cv05285
Plaintiff:
Scott Wallis
Defendant:
Alan Levine, Barry Cohodes, Thomas Gierlak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Levine
as 3:2009cv00994
Plaintiff:
Herschel Johnson
Defendant:
Dan Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Burman et al v. Novack and Macey LLP et al
as 2:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
B Don Burman, B Don Burman, Lonnie Ailes and others
Defendant:
Novack and Macey LLP, Novack and Macey LLP, Karen L Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ball v. Southwest Fiduciary, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Ball
Defendant:
Southwest Fiduciary, Inc., Gregory P. Dovico, Peggy Ann Dovico and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eleanor R. Ball Irrevocable Living Trust v. Southwest Fiduciary, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Eleanor R. Ball Irrevocable Living Trust
Defendant:
Southwest Fiduciary, Inc., Gregory P. Dovico, Peggy Ann Dovico and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kennedy et al vs AmeriQuest Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2008cv04462
Plaintiff:
Randy Kennedy, Randy Kennedy, Amii Kennedy and others
Defendant:
AmeriQuest Mortgage Company and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dorris et al v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02118
Plaintiff:
Ron Levin and Scott Dorris
Defendant:
Cabela's Inc., Gander Mountain Co., Bass Pro, Inc., and Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
