Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Estate of Jeremy Isadore Levin, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 23-7080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Estate of Jeremy Isadore Levin, Estate of Lucille Hare Levin and Suzelle M. Smith, Executrix of the Estate of Lucille Hare Levin and Successor in Interest to Jeremy Levin and Dr. Lucille Levin
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Owens, All Plaintiffs, 1:01-cv-02244 Owens, et al. v. Republic of Sudan, et al., Plaintiffs in 1:21-cv-00126, Judith Abasi Mwila and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Intervenor / Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor:
Crystal Holdings Limited
Estate of Jeremy Isadore Levin, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 23-7082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Jeremy Isadore Levin, Estate of Lucille Hare Levin, Suzelle M. Smith, Executrix of the Estate of Lucille Hare Levin and Successor in Interest to Jeremy Levin and Dr. Lucille Levin and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Owens, All Plaintiffs, 1:01-cv-02244 Owens, et al. v. Republic of Sudan, et al., Plaintiffs in 1:21-cv-00126, Judith Abasi Mwila and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Islamic Republic of Iran, Defendant in 05-2494, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Defendant in 05-2494 and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
United States of America
LEVINE v. MASELKA
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
WALTER LEVINE
Defendant:
KEVIN MASELKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee:
Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
BUNCH et al v. REPUBLIC SOUTH SUDAN et al
as 1:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
JESSE BUNCH, ADAD LEVIN, MARK RENZI and others
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC SOUTH SUDAN, SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND VETERAN AFFAIRS, SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF NATIONAL SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
as 1:2022mc00075
Not Classified By Court:
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
In Re:
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
Respondent:
THOMAS E. REYNOLDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
