Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Lewis v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liu v. Heastie et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lewis Y. Liu
Defendant:
Carl Heastie, William A. Barclay, Andrea Stewart-Cousins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. The City of New York
as 1:2023cv05822
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05412
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lewis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Champion Mortgage Company, Ros Borikin LLC, Mark I. Partnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
