Cases 21 - 30 of 115
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWLEY v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2021cv19031
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE P. CRAWLEY
Defendant:
SERGEANT T. WILLIAM, CORRECTION OFFICER M. LEWIS and SERGEANT M. DUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17792
Plaintiff:
WAYNE KENNETH LEWIS and KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv15868
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWLEY v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2021cv14526
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE P. CRAWLEY
Defendant:
SERGEANT T. WILLIAM, C.O. M. LEWIS and SERGEANT M. DUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. KAMINSKY et al
as 3:2021cv12009
Defendant:
DOCTOR CARLTON BAILOR, CFG HEALTH SYSTEM LLG and WARDEN PAUL KAMINSKY
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv02368
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv19185
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv18769
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
