Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lincare Holdings Inc. et al v. Doxo, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02349
Plaintiff:
Lincare Holdings Inc. and Lincare Licensing Inc.
Defendant:
Doxo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Kennedy v. Lincare Holdings Inc.
as 8:2022cv02275
Plaintiff:
Charlene Kennedy
Respondent:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Eichman v. Lincare Holdings Inc et al
as 8:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eichman
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc., Lincare Inc. and Lincare Pharmacy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Miller et al v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02142
Plaintiff:
George Miller and Michael Mcauley
Defendant:
LINCARE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morris v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Janet Morris
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Merrell v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02020
Plaintiff:
Cherry Merrell
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fudge et al v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fudge and Lisa Torres
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Juarez v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
Victor Juarez
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cottam v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01595
Plaintiff:
Catherine Cottam
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
