Cases 1 - 10 of 12
COMMON CAUSE et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2026cv01352
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE, COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND, ANTHONY NEL and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and TODD BLANCHE
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and FORMER EMPLOYEES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Weston v. Dehn et al
as 1:2019cv01288
Defendant:
John Doe V, J Fike, John Doe, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Renzi et al
as 1:2019cv01242
Defendant:
Todd Nelson, H Cox, Travis Bayler and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordell Sanders v. Michael Melvin, et al
as 17-1938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORDELL SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MELVIN, ANDREA MOSS, KELLY HAAG and others
Roman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Micheal P Melvin, Susan Prentice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordell Sanders v. Michael Melvin, et al
as 17-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORDELL SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MELVIN, ANDREA MOSS, KELLY HAAG and others
Jones v. Nelson et al
as 1:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Todd Nelson, Kelly Haag, Kelly Renzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
Donna Hogle
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Melvin Hinton, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Moss et al
as 1:2016cv01366
Plaintiff:
Cordell Sanders
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, Andrea Moss, . Marano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prentice et al
as 1:2016cv01244
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Susan Prentice, Andrea Moss, Kelly Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
