Cases 1 - 10 of 153
DANTZLER v. JORDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILL JORDEN, DOUGLAS WELBORN, ALVIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00516
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GRIMSLEY v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. GRIMSLEY, III
Defendant:
LLOYD AUSTIN and CHRISTINE WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SHARMA v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv02603
Plaintiff:
MEHUL SHARMA
Defendant:
LLOYD AUSTIN, MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, ROBIN ASHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUDSON et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
ROY P. HUDSON, JR., DEREK J. UNDERWOOD, STEVEN R. HEISHMAN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD AUSTIN, WILLIAM LAPLANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
