Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHAMBERS et al v. SD HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHRIS CHAMBERS , DANIEL WAINWRIGHT , GARY CHAPA and others
Defendant:
SD HOLDINGS, LLC, EVOLUTION ENERGY CHEMICAL COMPANY, EVOLUTION ENERGY INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LOFTIN v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06250
Plaintiff:
DONALD LOFTIN
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOFTIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42709
Plaintiff:
PRITCHETT T. LOFTIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36192
Plaintiff:
GARY W. LOFTIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv33281
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. LOFTIN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv33283
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. LOFTIN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. COVE SHIPPING INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33280
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. LOFTIN
Defendant:
COVE SHIPPING INC. , MARITIME OVERSEAS CORPORATION , SEA-LAND SERVICE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33282
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. LOFTIN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOFTIN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75883
Plaintiff:
GARY W LOFTIN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOFTIN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71652
Plaintiff:
PRITCHETT T. LOFTIN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
