Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Alotaibi v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-2523
Petitioner:
MAZEN ALOTAIBI
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, CHARLES DANIELS and LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Wygnanski v. Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wygnanski
Defendant:
Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections and Warden of the Lovelock Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 23-3312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JERI FEDERICKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15853
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Lovelock Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomson v. NDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Thomson
Defendant:
NDOC, NDOC Medical, Nurse Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alotaibi v. Baker et al
as 2:2021cv01281
Petitioner:
Mazen Alotaibi
Respondent:
Renee Baker, Lovelock Correctional Center and Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gene Allen v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15388
Respondent / Appellee:
AARON FORD, STATE OF NEVADA, GARRETT, Attorney and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENE ALLEN
Moran v. Warden LCC et al
as 3:2021cv00050
Petitioner:
Marvin Moran
Respondent:
Lovelock Correctional Center Warden and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gene Allen v. State of Nevada, et al
as 20-17228
Respondent / Appellee:
AARON FORD, STATE OF NEVADA, GARRETT, Attorney and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENE ALLEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
