Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
v. BEAULIEU et al
as 2:2020cv20398
Defendant: DONALD A. SCULLY, JR., GRAYSON, INC. TRANSPORT, UPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Chen et al
as 1:2020cv14719
Defendant: Lyft, Inc. and Mingqing Chen
Plaintiff: Paul Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MOORE v. CHEN et al
as 3:2020cv14719
Defendant: LYFT, INC. and MINGQING CHEN
Plaintiff: PAUL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv14465
Defendant: LYFT, INC., TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NALLS v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv13748
Plaintiff: UQUAJAH NALLS
Defendant: LYFT, INC., NJ TRANSIT CORP., CANDY A ENRIQUEZ-SEGURA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv12218
Plaintiff: STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant: TRAVELERS IDEMNITY COMPANY, TAHA VIP LIMO, INC., AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Type: Contract Insurance
DESPAIGNE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv07340
Plaintiff: OSCAR DESPAIGNE
Defendant: AHMAD R. BRUNSON, LYFT, INC. and TAHA VIP LIMO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
SATTERLEE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03519
Plaintiff: CATHERINE SATTERLEE
Defendant: LYFT, INC., LOGISTICARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRINCOLI v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03380
Defendant: RASIER LLC, RASIER DC LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: ANTONIO CRINCOLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GONZALEZ v. LYFT, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv20569
Defendant: LYFT, INC.
Plaintiff: RENIER GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?