Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Sharpe v. Lyft, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04336
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sharpe
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Flexdrive Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bayu v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
Daneal Bayu
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Lyft Inc and Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Williams v. Duverger et al
as 4:2022cv03394
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Williams
Defendant:
Yordano Duverger and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft Drives Texas, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mutschlechner et al v. Olivares et al
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Brian Mutschlechner and Lacy Picou
Defendant:
Raul Fagundo Olivares and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jeanmarie v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2022cv02500
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeanmarie, III
Defendant:
Jaime Roberts, Lyft, Inc., Indian Harbor Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Anissa Remo v. Lyft Inc.
as 5:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Anissa Remo
Defendant:
Lyft Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
FARE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
FARE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Vargas v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Reyes Vargas
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Brooks Baack and Olusegun Shokoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
