Cases 1 - 4 of 4
TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04571
Plaintiff:
TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA and LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45580
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Neighbors of Casino San Pablo, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighbors of Casino San Pablo, an unincorporated association, Andres Soto, Anne Ruffino and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echo Hawk, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs, National Indian Gaming Commission and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Lytton Rancheria Of California, a federally organized Indian Tribe, also known as Lytton Band Of Pomo Indians
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
