Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taboola, Inc. v. Ezoic Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09909
Plaintiff:
Taboola, Inc.
Defendant:
Ezoic Inc. and Dwayne Lafleur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lauachus et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv04145
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lauachus , Burnice Gentry , Cindy Jackson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lafleur v. Delta Airlines
as 1:2016cv02241
Defendant:
Delta Airlines
Plaintiff:
Jean Lafleur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berrocal v. Boosey & Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv05279
Plaintiff:
Marco Berrocal
Defendant:
Boosey & Co. Ltd. , Boosey & Hawkes, Inc. , Boosey & Hawkes Music Publishers Limited and others
Counter_claimant:
Boosey & Hawkes Music Publishers Limited , Boosey & Hawkes, Inc. and Boosey & Co. Ltd.
Counter_defendant:
Marco Berrocal
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lafleur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Michelle Deanna Lafleur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
