Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, John-Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, Warden DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEFFIELD v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv22030
Plaintiff:
LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance SheffieldIn re: Lance Sheffield
as 23-12808
Petitioner:
In re: LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Sheffield v. Warden, Desoto Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Warden, Desoto Correctional Institution, John Doe, Classification Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Warden, Desoto Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2022cv02671
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Warden, Desoto Correctional Institution, John Doe, Classification Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Sheffield v. Kenneth Tucker
as 17-10663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH TUCKER
Lance Sheffield v. F. Mock, et al
as 16-16776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
F. MOCK, Assistant Warden, FOSKEY, Assistant Warden, WARDEN and others
Sheffield v. Reed et al
as 3:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Thomas Reed, Clemens, Gartham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
