Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Lane et al v. Gold's Gym International, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00930
Plaintiff:
Macario Escamilla, III and Lawrence J. Lane
Defendant:
Gold's Gym International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lane v. Engineering & Inspections Hawaii, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Henson Lane
Defendant:
Engineering & Inspections Hawaii, Inc. and Highmark Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lane v. Tavax, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00656
Plaintiff:
Javawski Lane
Defendant:
Tavax, Inc. and Fardin Tavakoli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reyes v. Lane et al
as 4:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Eugene Reyes
Defendant:
Christopher Lane and Gerald Lane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Kirk v. Tesoro Corporation
as 5:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lane Kirk
Defendant:
Tesoro Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lane Begnaud v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Fdn, et al
as 09-30408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANE BEGNAUD
Defendant - Appellee:
BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD FOUNDATION, formerly known as Louisiana Child Care Foundation Inc, formerly known as Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co PAC, HMO LOUISIANA INC and LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY CO, doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana
Celestein et al v. Schooner Petroleum Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01338
Plaintiff:
Kinley Celestein, David L Gotcher, Rebecca Lawlis and others
Petitioner:
Susan Staley
Defendant:
Schooner Petroleum Services, Inc., Oil States International, Inc. and Specialty Rental Tools & Supply, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 WARN ACT
Villega v. ML Deer Construction Company, L.P. et al
as 4:2008cv01116
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Villega
Defendant:
ML Deer Construction Company, L.P., MLD Interests, L.L.C., ML Deer Construction Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
