Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Smith v. Mills et al
as 1:2020cv02260
Defendant:
Shay Krausz, Alan J. Waintraub, Esq., Bradley Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Florence F. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson et al v. Ciccia et al
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kwame Anthony, Mark Stephen and Treazur Watson
Defendant:
Armellini Express Lanes, Inc. and Miguel Ciccia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quinn et al v. Crosby Capital USA LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00358
Plaintiff:
Christopher Quinn and Teignmouth Hall LLC
Defendant:
Law office of Steven Rubel, Bridge Lane NY LLC, Kevin Rodman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ryan v. Priley Lane LLC
as 2:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Priley Lane LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ryan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ryan v. Priley Lane LLC
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Priley Lane LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ryan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lane v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv03842
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lanet Lane
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fiscal Investments Ltd. v. 379 Captains Neck Lane LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03582
Defendant:
Principal Investment Group Inc. and 379 Captains Neck Lane LLC
Plaintiff:
Fiscal Investments Ltd and Fiscal Investments Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
