Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Langford v. Haner et al
as 3:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Fred D. Langford
Defendant:
Eric Haner, Jewell Lewis and Jameel Ameer Uqdah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Daniels
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanheck v. Marion County Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00653
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Vanheck
Defendant:
Marion County Kentucky , Washington County, Kentucky , J. Barry Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 6:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak, J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Song et al
as 5:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mar. R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Song et al
as 0:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak, J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Byas v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Micah M. Byas
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ballard County Court, Carlisle County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Stacey et al
as 5:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Ratliff
Defendant:
Mike Stacey, Angela Troutman and Timothy Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alicia Romero et al v McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Alicia Romero , Refugio Romero , Sherry Keef and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
