Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Larry Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., et al
as 15-12085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., THOMAS FITTON, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
Larry Klayman v. City Pages, et al
as 15-11489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY PAGES, KEN WEINER, a.k.a. Ken Avidor, AARON RUPAR and others
Klayman v. Clinton et al
as 9:2015cv80388
Plaintiff:
Larry E Klayman
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton , William Jefferson Clinton and Clinton Foundation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KLAYMAN v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
as 1:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Larry Klayman
as 15-10546
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Mandamus Respondent:
CITY PAGES, KEN WEINER, a.k.a. Ken Avidor, AARON RUPAR and others
KLAYMAN v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01704
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, ANTHONY S. FACUI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , JOHN DOE, 1 , JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, HAMAS, MALIK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Larry Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., et al
as 14-13855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., THOMAS FITTON, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , CHARLES STRANGE , MARY ANN STRANGE and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00881
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , MICHAEL FERRARI , CHARLES STRANGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
