Cases 1 - 10 of 100
In re: Larry Thomas, Jr.
as 26-12391
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER, W. LOUIS SANDS, MARC T. TREADWELL and others
Larry Thomas, Jr.In re: Larry Thomas, Jr.
as 26-12350
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER, W. LOUIS SANDS, MARC T. TREADWELL and others
(PC) Jacks v. Johnson et al
as 2:2026cv02168
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Jacks
Defendant:
Johnson and Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kauffman, Larry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Kauffman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Larry Thomas, Jr. v. James Prine, et al
as 26-11981
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES L. PRINE, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, BRIAN KEMP and others
Little v. Eldridge et al
as 3:2026cv00069
Plaintiff:
Larrie Lee Little
Defendant:
Stacy Eldridge and Barry G. Dickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Lacy et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division et al
as 4:2025cv06184
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy and Larry Lee Wright
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and Marvin Dunber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Elkin et al
as 4:2025cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dewayne Stanley
Defendant:
Darrell Wayne Elkin, Jackson, Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacks v. Mauck, et al
as 2:2025cv02651
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Jacks
Defendant:
A. Mauck, M. Roby, D. Stalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
