Cases 1 - 10 of 332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
London v. River Rouge PD et al
as 2:2024cv10754
Plaintiff:
Randall Tremayne London
Defendant:
River Rouge PD, Barton Morris Law Firm and Wayne, County of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobronski v. Labovick & Labovick, P.A.
as 4:2024cv10561
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Labovick & Labovick, P.A. Doing business as Labovick Law Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dobronski v. On Point Financial Solutions, Inc et al
as 4:2023cv12780
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
On Point Financial Solutions, Inc Doing business as Tax Law Advocates and Zaid Mohammad Khatib
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Farr #607251 v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Domonique Demetris Farr #607251
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Law Revision Commission and People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Rickel et al
as 2:2023cv12538
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
John M. Rickel, The Rickel law firm P.C. and Association Dues Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
