Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Denton et al v. Cortland Ridge Apartments et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Janet Denton and Eric Denton
Defendant:
Cortland Ridge Apartments and The Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Conlin v. RU Cliff et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Conlin
Defendant:
RU Cliff, Rise Homesourse, Jon Neviaser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Jones v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore et al
as 2:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore and Charlene Barlow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith et al v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
as 2:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Carl Smith and Melanie Smith
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Delgado et al v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
as 2:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delgado and Kaiulani Delgado
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodriguez v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore et al
as 2:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore and Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young et al v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
as 2:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Dallas Young and Erna Langhans
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ewell v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
as 2:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Candace Ewell
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
