Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01679
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINE CASE OF
as 1:2018mc00025
Respondent: ROBERT CHEESEBOUROUGH
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINE CASE OF
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS (KRASNOFF)
as 1:2014mc00101
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASE
Respondent: DOUGLAS KRASNOFF
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS
as 1:2014mc00086
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASE
Respondent: JEFFERY D. HECK
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS
as 1:2012mc00048
Respondent: LINDSAY T. BOYD, LOUIS W. DENNEY, BRADLEY D. HAMILTON and others
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS . . .
as 1:2011mc00028
Respondent: TIA R. BREWER, DARREN T. COLE, TIMOTHY A. DOYLE and others
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:
HOLDER v. LANDMAN & BEATTY, LAWYERS, LLP
as 1:2009cv00680
Plaintiff: SHEILA HOLDER, SHEILA HOLDER and SHEILA HOLDER
Defendant: LANDMAN & BEATTY, LAWYERS, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: BANIK et al
as 1:2009mc00054
Respondent: MICHAEL J. KIAS, HEATHER L. CLARK-REYNOLDS, RICKY D. DOYLE and others
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?