Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
David Crooks
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
TATE v. LAYNE & BOWLER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66771
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH TATE
Defendant:
LAYNE & BOWLER, INC. , LAYNE & BOWLER PUMP CO. , MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Layne & Bowler, Inc. et al
as MSS/3:11-CV-00348
Plaintiff:
Tate
Defendant:
Layne & Bowler, Inc
Tate v. Layne & Bowler, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Tate
Defendant:
Layne & Bowler, Inc. , Layne & Bowler Pump Co. , Minnesota Mining & Manufacturig Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PATTERSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84696
Plaintiff:
WILBERT PATTERSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WOODALL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84728
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WOODALL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
REID v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84699
Plaintiff:
MOSES REID
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CONWAY v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84777
Plaintiff:
SAMMY CONWAY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WOODALL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84729
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WOODALL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLOUNT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84754
Plaintiff:
JOEL BLOUNT
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
