Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Narducci et al v. Building Materials Corporation of America
as 2:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Narducci and Leanne Claxton
Defendant:
BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isom v. Merck & Co et al
as 3:2012cv06859
Plaintiff:
Leann Isom
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES et al v. MERCK & CO. et al
as 3:2012cv06445
Plaintiff:
LEANNE HOLMES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. and MERCK SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mott v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
as 3:2012cv05020
Plaintiff:
LeAnn Mott
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HADLEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04241
Plaintiff:
LEANNE EDWARDS HADLEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PURSE et al v. URBANOWICZ
as 3:2009cv05297
Plaintiff:
LEANNE K PURSE and RICHARD M PURSE, D.O.
Defendant:
LUANNE URBANOWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RICHARDSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2008cv00797
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN LEANN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. and ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
