Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Houston Delihue III v. Werthwein et al
as 1:2019cv00494
Defendant:
Dawn Dawson, Diggins, Robert Werthwein and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Delihue III v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2018cv03276
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Delihue III v. Denver Probate Ct. et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue III
Defendant:
Denver Probate CT., Elizabeth Leith, Melissa R. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Delihue III v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2017cv01015
Petitioner:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue III
Defendant:
Siobhan Burtlow and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Houston v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston
Defendant:
Hickenlooper, Raemisch, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Delihue v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv03155
Petitioner:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Houston Delihue III et al v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston Delihue III and S.C.C.F. Inmates, The
Defendant:
Hickenlooper, Raemisch, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv01884
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston
Defendant:
Raemisch, Merriam Reynolds and James Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv00451
Petitioner:
Kyle Lee Houston
Respondent:
Raemisch and Attorney General of the State of Coloardo, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Houston v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv02088
Petitioner:
Kyle Lee Houston
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Ricky Raemisch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
