Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Martha Lee Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01866
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2022cv01571
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2022cv01133
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02572
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C.R. BARD, INC. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Williams
as 4:2020cv02071
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abels, et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, et al
as 1:2020op45113
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Mitchell (deceased), by and through daughter and next of kin, Felicia Leonard, Timothy Jay Minchew, Sherri Gates and others
Defendant:
Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Rocklyn S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04212
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20069
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Jones
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
