Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03327
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABELON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
JOHN ABELON, JOHN MARK ALLEN, FRANK BEAMON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04853
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2021cv00110
Defendant:
ISAAC BOYKIN, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and JUSTIN HILL
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE MORRIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. MCNEIL
as 4:2020cv00543
Petitioner:
LARRY LEE MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
WALT MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02729
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARCELL LEE MORRIS WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26469
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE MORRIS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2020cv00299
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18014
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE MORRIS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95100
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
