Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kenneth Dunn v. Leo Schmitz, et al
as 22-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH DUNN
Defendant / Appellee:
LEO P. SCHMITZ, JOANN JOHNSON and ISAIAH VEGA
Shane Kitterman v. City of Belleville, et al
as 20-1919
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENDAN KELLY, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, substituted for claims against Leo P. Schmitz in his official capacity, JENNIFER EDWARDS, MIKE MARTIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE A. KITTERMAN
Shane Kitterman v. City of Belleville, et al
as 20-1875
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENDAN KELLY, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, substituted for claims against Leo P. Schmitz in his official capacity, JENNIFER EDWARDS, MIKE MARTIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE A. KITTERMAN
Calvin Grissom v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-2153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN A. GRISSOM
Defendant / Appellee:
LEO P. SCHMITZ, JOHN R. BALDWIN and JOHN BALDWIN
Lawson v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv03494
Defendant:
Deborah Hagan, Jesse White, State Of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitterman v. City of Belleville et al
as 3:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
Shane A. Kitterman
Defendant:
Tracie Newton, City of Belleville, Belleville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv08369
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan and Leo P Schmitz
Plaintiff:
Jeff Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Talavera v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv03125
Plaintiff:
Emerio Talavera
Defendant:
John Baldwin and Leo P Schmitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Winter v. Schmitz
as 1:2018cv03667
Plaintiff:
Jacob Winter
Defendant:
Leo P. Schmitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
