Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Cornelius Patterson, Jr. v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3401
Plaintiff / Appellant: CORNELIUS PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of O.D.R.C., PRINCIPAL BETH OEHLER, THOMAS KING, Institution Librarian and others
Interested Party: STATE OF OHIO
Miller v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01758
Petitioner: Charles Miller
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodenberger v. Hill
as 3:2022cv01433
Petitioner: Jason Rodenberger
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Almedom v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02229
Petitioner: Sefe A. Almedom
Respondent: Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall Young v. Leon Hill
as 22-3414
Petitioner / Appellant: RANDALL T. YOUNG
Respondent / Appellee: LEON HILL, Warden
Almedom v. Hill
as 3:2022cv00706
Petitioner: Sefe A Almedom and Sefe A. Almedom
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Dunn v. Leon Hill
as 22-3300
Petitioner / Appellant: DAMON DUNN
Respondent / Appellee: LEON HILL, Warden
Feathers v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00540
Petitioner: David E. Feathers
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Feathers v. Hill
as 5:2022cv00541
Petitioner: David E. Feathers
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Feathers v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff: David E. Feathers
Defendant: Annette Chambers Smith, Chief Inspector Chris Lambert, Warden Leon Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?