Cases 1 - 10 of 1,740
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gan et al v. GSUIG Real Estate Member LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04234
Plaintiff:
Lihua Gan, Pu Gao, Yashu Li and others
Defendant:
GSUIG Real Estate Member LLC, Webster Bank N.A., Empire Outlet Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chimborazo v. Lucky Dragon 168 Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02659
Plaintiff:
Maria Chimborazo
Defendant:
Lucky Dragon 168 Inc. and Li Yu Li
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jiang v. Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd et al
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd, Dollar Tree Store 132-23 14th Avenue and Li Dongsheng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
