Cases 1 - 10 of 93
RE/MAX, LLC v. JL United Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
JL United Realty, LLC and Cheng Josie Lin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Fuller et al v. Jefferson County, Colorado
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ANN PARADY, LAURA M. HODGSON, ROCHELLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 47101 - Airport & Airway Improvement Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00923
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DP Creations v. Chen Lin
as 2:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
DP Creations a Utah limited liability company doing business as Bountiful Baby
Defendant:
Chen Lin an unknown business entity doing business as EIVVFIE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Purple Innovation v. Bedmate-U et al
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Purple Innovation
Defendant:
Bedmate-U, Chuang Fan Handicraft, Dongguan Bounce Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Hueffmeier v. Talentum Empowerment Institute, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02333
Plaintiff:
Brett Hueffmeier
Defendant:
Talentum Empowerment Institute, LLC, KnowledgeLink Group, Inc., Yi Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Allen v. Crow
as 22-6141
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY LIN ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
Allen v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Gregory Lin Allen
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chengling Peng et al v. Ilhom Abdurazzaqov et al
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Chengling Peng and Zong Yu Lin
Defendant:
Ilhom Abdurazzaqov and Shire Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
