Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WGB, LLC v. Bowling et al
as 2:2013cv01881
Plaintiff:
WGB, LLC
Defendant:
Philip Bowling , Jennie M. Bowling , U.S. Bank National Association and others
Counter_claimant:
Jennie M. Bowling and Philip Bowling
Counter_defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
as 2:2010cv01091
Plaintiff:
Felecia Barrow
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP and Southwest Business Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 2:2010cv00951
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Williams
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horne v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
as 2:2010cv00952
Plaintiff:
Pamela Horne
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
as 3:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson and Debra Jackson
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shamery v. Litton Loan Services LP et al
as 7:2010cv02271
Plaintiff:
Martarosa Shamery
Defendant:
Litton Loan Services LP and Southwest Business Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
as 3:2009cv01165
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson, Robert Jackson, Debra Jackson and others
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP and Litton Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gachette et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
as 2:2008cv00680
Plaintiff:
Freddie Gachette and Erma Thompson
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LP and Litton Loan Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lucas v. Litton Loan Servicing
as 2:2007cv00862
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lucas
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, Litton Loan Servicing and Litton Loan Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
