Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kaitlyn Gill, et al v. Loren Gill, et al
as 15-15503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAITLYN GILL and LAUREN GILL, individually
Defendant - Appellant:
LOREN C. GILL and ELM LEASING LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL VANGASKEN
:
SERVICE
Kaitlyn Gill, et al v. Loren Gill, et al
as 15-11031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAITLYN GILL and LAUREN GILL, Individually
Defendant - Appellant:
LOREN C. GILL and ELM LEASING LLC
SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC et al v. GILL et al
as 4:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC , EASTERN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC , KEVIN HARTSHORN and others
Defendant:
JOHN GILL, LOREN C GILL , MICHAEL GILL and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
DAN VAN GASKEN and KEVIN HARTSHORN
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MICHAEL GILL , PMCA LLC and LOREN C GILL
Counter_claimant:
MICHAEL GILL and PMCA LLC
Counter_defendant:
EASTERN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC , ORDER OF THE IAL INC and SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MULTI MARTS CORP and MICHAEL GILL
Intervenor_defendant:
SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC, EASTERN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC, ORDER OF THE IAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eastern Property Development, et al v. Loren Gill
as 13-10219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EASTERN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Utah limited liability company and SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant:
LOREN C GILL
GILL et al v. HARTSHORN et al
as 4:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
KAREN GILL and LAUREN GILL
Defendant:
KEVIN HARTSHORN, DANIEL VANGASKEN, JAY NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. NICOL
as 4:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Loren C Gill
Defendant:
JAY NICOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eastern Property Development LLC et al v. Gill
as 4:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Eastern Property Development LLC and South East Enterprise Group LLC
Defendant:
Loren C Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
