Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 134
MANNING v. CLAPPER et al
as 1:2016cv02307
Plaintiff: CHELSEA E. MANNING
Defendant: JAMES R. CLAPPER, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH
as 1:2016cv02195
Petitioner: GREGORY WILLIAMS
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OMRAN v. COMEY et al
as 1:2016cv02171
Plaintiff: MOHAMMED ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant: JAMES COMEY, TIMOTHY MOYNIHAN, SARAH SALDANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff: JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant: LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ike Nunn v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-5305
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ike Shawndale Nunn
Defendant - Appellee: Loretta E. Lynch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CISNEROS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02095
Plaintiff: JUAN GABRIEL CISNEROS
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ANDREW S. HANEN, CHARLES E. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff: SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02026
Plaintiff: DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?