Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Morrison et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06167
Plaintiff:
Lori Morrison and Timothy Morrison
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. doing business as Exactech and Exactech US, Inc. doing business as Exactech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2022md03044
In Re:
In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mark Goldman, Lawrence Daly, Alexander Berger and others
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc., TPG Capital and others
Interested Party:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and Brown Greer, LLC
Petitioner:
Cynthia Veneziano, Joseph Mackin, Deborah Mackin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morrison et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as TXN/3:22-CV-00880
Plaintiff:
Morrison, Lori Morrison and Timothy Morrison
Defendant:
Exactech Inc, Exactech Inc doing business as Exactech and Exactech US Inc. doing business as Exactech
Morrison et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Lori Morrison and Timothy Morrison
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech US Inc, Exactech Inc doing business as Exactech and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott v. Coastal Staffing Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
Robin Scott , Travis Haynes, Kersey Biagase and others
Defendant:
Coastal Staffing Services, LLC, Brett J Feldes, Charles P. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morrison v. Liberty Mutual Insurance et al
as 2:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lori Morrison
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Morrison et al v. Nautilus Inc
as 6:2007cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Russell Morrison and Lori Morrison
Defendant:
Nautilus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
