Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McIntosh v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02156
Petitioner:
Louis Mcintosh
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael McIntosh v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10923
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LOUIS MCINTOSH
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
McIntosh v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01519
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael Louis McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Mcintosh
as 17-2623
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Ramirez, AKA Taz, Terrence Duhaney, AKA Bounty Killer, Turhan Jessamy, AKA Vay and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Louis McIntosh, AKA Lou D, AKA Lou Diamond, AKA G
McIntosh v. Strada
as 16-2676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis McIntosh
Defendant - Appellee:
Frank Strada, Duke Terrell, Paige, Unit Manager and others
McIntosh v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00202
Petitioner:
Michael Louis McIntosh
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Mcintosh
as 14-1908
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Ramirez, AKA Taz, Terrence Duhaney, AKA Bounty Killer, Turhan Jessamy, AKA Vay and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Louis Mcintosh, AKA Lou D, AKA Lou Diamond, AKA G
McIntosh v. Strada et al
as 1:2013cv03615
Defendant:
Health Services Official, Mundo, Paige and others
Plaintiff:
Louis McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joe McIntosh
as 11-2231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOE LOUIS MCINTOSH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
