Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Randall Hinton v. Birkholtz et al
as 2:2022cv07755
Petitioner:
Randall Hinton
Respondent:
Warden Birkholtz and Louis Milusnic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vincent Reed v. Six Unknown Agents
as 2:2022cv03973
Plaintiff:
Vincent Reed
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Louis Milusnic, Liza Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cory Mitchell v. Louis Milusnic et al
as 2:2021cv09657
Plaintiff:
Cory Mitchell
Defendant:
Warden Louis Milusnic, Counselor J. Garcia, Dr Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConnell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv03655
Plaintiff:
Shelley McConnell
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States of America, Warden Louis Milusnic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Shelley McConnell v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv03661
Plaintiff:
Shelley McConnell
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Louis Milusnic, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Yonnedil Carror Torres et al v. Louis Milusnic et al
as 2:2020cv04450
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Fears, Felix Samuel Garcia, Yonnedil Carror Torres and others
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Louis Milusnic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christopher Lawrence Jeburk v. Louis Milusnic
as 2:2019cv09321
Respondent:
Louis Milusnic
Petitioner:
Christopher Lawrence Jeburk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mutulu Shakur v. Louis Milusnic et al
as 5:2019cv00727
Respondent:
Louis Milusnic, Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Mutulu Shakur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenneth Wayne Froude v. Louis Milusnic
as 2:2016cv05353
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Froude
Respondent:
Louis Milusnic
Thomas P Vitrano v. D Wong et al
as 5:2014cv02561
Defendant:
H Biagiante, H Biagiante, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Vitrano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
