Cases 1 - 10 of 27
HYC Logistics, Inc. v. Louise Paris, Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
HYC Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Louise Paris, Ltd, Joseph Barnathan, Solomon Barnathan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Shaoxing Chenyee Textile Co. Ltd. v. Louise Paris Ltd.
as 1:2023cv06755
Plaintiff:
Shaoxing Chenyee Textile Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Louise Paris Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bhavika Apparels Pvt. Ltd. v. Louise Paris, Ltd.
as 1:2023cv06177
Plaintiff:
Bhavika Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
Defendant:
Louise Paris, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dowge International Development, LTD. v. Louise Paris, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv07880
Plaintiff:
Dowge International Development, LTD.
Defendant:
Louise Paris, Ltd. doing business as Me Jane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Design Collection, Inc. v. The TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10265
Defendant:
Beall's, Inc., Does 1-10, Louise Paris, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Design Collection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Star Fabrics Inc v. Louise Paris Ltd et al
as 2:2017cv06540
Defendant:
Does, Louise Paris Ltd and Rainbow USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Fabric Selection, Inc. v. Louise Paris, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv05584
Defendant:
Does, Louise Paris, Ltd. and Ross Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fabric Selection, Inc.
Louise Paris, Ltd. v. Fabric Selection, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05697
Plaintiff:
Louise Paris, Ltd. and Ross Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Fabric Selection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Unicolors, Inc. v. Louise Paris, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Defendant:
DOES, Louise Paris, Ltd. and United Fashions of Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Star Fabrics Inc v. Louise Paris, Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv05086
Defendant:
Chang K. Kang, Dahdoul Textiles, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
