Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Larry Harris, et al v. Lowell Brown, et al
as 16-2218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY G. HARRIS, DOMINICK GIAMPAOLO, JEFFERY KNIGHT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWELL BROWN, DENNIS LARSON, ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Doctor and others
Brown v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01494
Plaintiff:
Lowell Brown
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larry Harris, et al v. Lowell Brown, et al
as 15-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY G. HARRIS, DOMINICK GIAMPAOLO, JEFFERY KNIGHT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWELL BROWN, DENNIS LARSON, ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Doctor and others
Oliphant v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2012cv03011
Plaintiff:
Gary N Oliphant
Defendant:
Michael Randle, James Sledge, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. Randle et al
as 3:2011cv03109
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lockett
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Brown
as 3:2011cv03047
Plaintiff:
Gary Oliphant
Defendant:
Lowell Brown , Dennis . Larson , Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jerry B Palmer
Defendant:
Michael Randle, Roger E Walker, Jr, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Shah et al
as 3:2010cv03153
Plaintiff:
Donchii Malone
Defendant:
Yipin Shah, Lowel Brown, Daniel Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Shah et al
as 1:2010cv01203
Plaintiff:
Donchii Malone
Defendant:
Yipin Shah, Lowel Brown, Daniel Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Traylor v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv03324
Plaintiff:
Alexander Traylor
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Randle, James Sledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
